Automotive
Mazda’s latest move within the SUV market has sparked intrigue with its unveiling of the CX-70, a model that appears to be a trimmed-down version of the CX-90, lacking the third row typically present in its larger counterpart. The announcement of the pricing for the 2025 CX-70 has added one other layer to this comparison, revealing that every iteration of the two-row SUV will bear the identical price tag as its 2024 CX-90 equivalent. Nevertheless, it’s value noting that despite this apparent similarity, the CX-70 is exclusively available in higher-spec trims, leading to a base price that surpasses that of the CX-90.
The value range for the CX-70 spans from $41,820 for the entry-level CX-70 3.3 Turbo Preferred to $58,825 for the top-tier PHEV Premium Plus. For context, the 2024 CX-90 Select is priced at $39,220, indicating a minor disparity within the starting prices of the 2 models. Despite this, it’s anticipated that the costs of the CX-90 won’t escalate significantly, if in any respect, suggesting that ultimately, the 2 SUVs needs to be similarly priced.
STARTING MSRP (includes $1,375 destination charge) FOR THE 2025 MAZDA CX-70 IS AS FOLLOWS:
CX-70 3.3 Turbo Preferred | $41,820 |
CX-70 3.3 Turbo Premium | $47,275 |
CX-70 3.3 Turbo Premium Plus | $50,275 |
CX-70 3.3 Turbo S Premium | $53,825 |
CX-70 3.3 Turbo S Premium Plus | $57,325 |
CX-70 PHEV Premium | $55,775 |
CX-70 PHEV Premium Plus | $58,825 |
Under the hood, the CX-70 and CX-90 boast equivalent powertrain options, featuring a 3.3-liter turbocharged inline-six engine available in two variations, delivering either 280 horsepower or 340 horsepower. Moreover, each models offer a plug-in hybrid drivetrain equipped with a four-cylinder engine and an electrical motor, coupled with an eight-speed automatic gearbox and all-wheel drive as standard. The first discrepancies between the CX-70 and CX-90 lie of their seating capability and a few cosmetic distinctions of their front and rear fascias, in addition to trim and color decisions.
The choice to introduce two separate models reasonably than offering a single model with customizable seating options may raise questions amongst enthusiasts. Speculation suggests that Mazda’s alternative can have been influenced by cost considerations, potentially opting to streamline operations by certifying the CX-70 and CX-90 as essentially the identical vehicle for the US market. Despite the reasonable pricing of the CX-70, which rivals luxury competitors like Audi, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz in refinement and luxury, it might disappoint those anticipating a more budget-friendly and compact alternative with the discharge of the CX-70.
FOLLOW US TODAY:
This Article First Appeared At www.automotiveaddicts.com